TAX ALERT |
On August 29, Treasury released Notice 2020-65 (the Notice) in response to President Trump’s August 8th memorandum requesting a delayed due date for employee’s share of Social Security tax for the remainder of 2020 (specifically, September 1 through December 31). Previously, the CARES Act deferred the employer’s portion of Social Security tax for 2020; the tax that is being addressed with current guidance is the employee’s portion of Social Security tax (i.e. not the employer’s portion and not federal income or Medicare tax).
The President’s memorandum was an attempt to help workers in response to the on-going COVID-19 pandemic, issued when Congress was not able to come to consensus on a new stimulus package to provide individuals’ additional relief. By deferring the due date for certain payroll taxes that would normally be withheld from employees’ paychecks, those employees will receive more net pay for the four months the memorandum covers. However, the President only has the power to ask for deadlines to be delayed under specific disaster provisions and, therefore, the tax is still owed, but payable later than it otherwise would be. Thus, any paycheck increases now will result in reduced paychecks in the future (absent Congressional action to forgive the tax or otherwise reduce the future liability). The Administration has noted that it will ask Congress to forgive the tax, but this will need to be a Congressional decision.
The President’s memorandum provided little detail as it serves only as a mechanism to ask Treasury to supply guidance. In the past few weeks, many employers, payroll providers and other professionals have contemplated many practical issues with the delayed deadline, and eagerly awaited Treasury’s release to determine a course of action. Unfortunately, the Notice does not provide as many answers as employers may have hoped for. The following summarizes the main factors in the payroll deferral:
- How do you determine who is eligible? The President’s memorandum made the payroll tax deferral available to employees who make less than $4,000 during any bi-weekly pay period (or presumably about $104,000 per year). The Notice clarifies that wages as defined in sections 3121(a) or 3231(e) for September 1 through December 31 are eligible, “but only if the amount of such wages or compensation paid for a bi-weekly pay period is less than the threshold amount of $4,000, or the equivalent threshold amount with respect to other pay periods.” Thus, employers must look to wages by pay period, irrespective of other periods, and the $4,000 (or equivalent) is basically a cliff. Someone who earns $4,001 for that period is not eligible for the deferral in that pay period on any part of his or her wages.
- When is deferred tax due? The Notice provides that the deferred taxes are due ratably from Jan. 1 through April 30, 2021, providing only a four month deferral period. For those concerned about employees getting more cash now only to receive less later, this deferral period likely does not alleviate those concerns as it essentially means saving 6.2% on wages for the next four months and then paying 12.4% (that is, the employee will pay regular Social Security on their wages in early 2021 and pay back the deferred 6.2% for the following four months (as opposed to having a longer payback period that would not see each paycheck reduced by as much during the payback period).
- How do employees pay it back? Although many were hoping for Treasury to provide a mechanism under which the employee would pay the deferred tax back through a means other than by employer withholding, the Notice does not provide this. The Notice requires the employer to withhold and pay the deferred tax ratably from Jan. 1 through April 30, 2021. The Notice does state, “If necessary, the Affected Taxpayer [i.e. the employer] may make arrangements to otherwise collect the total Applicable Taxes from the employee.” This might include an employer offering employees a longer ‘payroll loan’ with the employer depositing the deferred social security taxes within the time frame. However, the ‘other arrangements’ language may also be an instruction to employers whose employees have separated service before the repayment period is over.
- Is it mandatory? Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin announced publicly on August 12 that the deferral would not be mandatory. In other words, employers can choose to continue to withhold and remit this tax, despite a delayed deadline. Information Release 2020-195 also issued on Friday describes the Notice as “allowing employers to defer” but nothing states that it is required.
With a release date only a few days before the September 1 effective date, it is virtually impossible to defer withholding on eligible pay for the entire four month period. Employers who are willing to follow the Notice and implement it as soon as possible still must consider whether they are willing to potentially cover the tax for employees who terminate employment or do not have enough wages for Jan. through April to cover the deferred withholding. Employers will also have to work closely with their payroll providers to implement this change in deposits.
The Notice leaves unanswered questions that may or may not be covered in future guidance from the IRS such as:
- Should the employer allow employees to choose between deferral and no deferral or should it be automatic (most discussion to date has suggested that employees should not be burdened with a future payment unless they specifically agree to that burden)?
- If an employee terminates employment owing back Social Security taxes, can an employer do catch-up withholding from the final paycheck?
- Can an employer require an employee to sign a promissory note for the deferred tax amount?
- If an employer is unable to collect the tax from an employee and pays that tax for the employee, is the payment of the tax additional wages? It would seem to be, and as additional wages, additional Social Security and income tax withholding would apply, all of which would be employer costs.
- How does an employer prioritize the collecting repayments? Does the employer remit an employee’s health care and other welfare benefit premiums and 401(k) contribution first and then collect the deferred Social Security tax. Or will the employer have an obligation to collect the deferred tax first?
Whether employers choose to follow the Notice or not, an employer should strongly consider letting its employees know whether deferral will be an available option, as many individuals are aware of the President’s action and may expect increased paychecks.
Questions or Want to Talk?
Call us directly at 972.221.2500 (Flower Mound) or 940.591.9300 (Denton),
or complete the form below and we’ll contact you to discuss your specific situation.
This article was written by Anne Bushman, Bill O’Malley and originally appeared on 2020-08-31.
2020 RSM US LLP. All rights reserved.
The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. RSM US LLP guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. RSM US LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer.
RSM US Alliance provides its members with access to resources of RSM US LLP. RSM US Alliance member firms are separate and independent businesses and legal entities that are responsible for their own acts and omissions, and each are separate and independent from RSM US LLP. RSM US LLP is the U.S. member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax, and consulting firms. Members of RSM US Alliance have access to RSM International resources through RSM US LLP but are not member firms of RSM International. Visit rsmus.com/aboutus for more information regarding RSM US LLP and RSM International. The RSM(tm) brandmark is used under license by RSM US LLP. RSM US Alliance products and services are proprietary to RSM US LLP.
KHA Accountants, PLLC is a proud member of RSM US Alliance, a premier affiliation of independent accounting and consulting firms in the United States. RSM US Alliance provides our firm with access to resources of RSM US LLP, the leading provider of audit, tax and consulting services focused on the middle market. RSM US LLP is a licensed CPA firm and the U.S. member of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax and consulting firms with more than 43,000 people in over 120 countries.
Our membership in RSM US Alliance has elevated our capabilities in the marketplace, helping to differentiate our firm from the competition while allowing us to maintain our independence and entrepreneurial culture. We have access to a valuable peer network of like-sized firms as well as a broad range of tools, expertise, and technical resources.
For more information on how KHA Accountants can assist you, please call 972.221.2500.